Connect with us

Fitness

Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife – Nature Ecology & Evolution

Published

on

  • Parker, K. et al. Demographic and Economic Trends in Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities (Pew Research Center, 2018).

  • Pickett, S. T. A. et al. A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst. 1, 185–199 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grimm, N. B. et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756–760 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Locke, D. H. & Baine, G. The good, the bad, and the interested: how historical demographics explain present-day tree canopy, vacant lot and tree request spatial variability in New Haven, CT. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 391–409 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Locke, D. H. et al. Residential housing segregation and urban tree canopy in 37 US Cities. npj Urban Sustain https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00022-0 (2021).

  • Schell, C. J. et al. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science 369, eaay4497 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Massey, D. S. & Denton, N. A. The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc. Forces 67, 281 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Logan, J. R. Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. Am. J. Sociol. 84, 404–416 (1978).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Logan, J. R. & Molotch, H. L. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (Univ. of California Press, 1987).

  • Morello-Frosch, R. A. Discrimination and the political economy of environmental inequality. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 20, 477–496 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woods, L. L. The federal home loan bank board, redlining, and the national proliferation of racial lending discrimination, 1921–1950. J. Urban Hist. 38, 1036–1059 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hope, D. et al. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8788–8792 (2003).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwarz, K. et al. Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS ONE 10, e0122051 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rigolon, A. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: a literature review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 153, 160–169 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leong, M., Dunn, R. R. & Trautwein, M. D. Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180082 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rigolon, A., Browning, M. & Jennings, V. Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: an environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plan. 178, 156–169 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuras, E. R. et al. Urban socioeconomic inequality and biodiversity often converge, but not always: a global meta-analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 198, 103799 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kinzig, A. P., Warren, P., Martin, C., Hope, D. & Katti, M. The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 10, art23 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lerman, S. B. & Warren, P. S. The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people. Ecol. Appl. 21, 1327–1339 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hammer, M. S., Swinburn, T. K. & Neitzel, R. L. Environmental noise pollution in the United States: developing an effective public health response. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 115–119 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shannon, G. et al. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife: effects of anthropogenic noise on wildlife. Biol. Rev. 91, 982–1005 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barber, J. R., Crooks, K. R. & Fristrup, K. M. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 180–189 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • The Urban Noise Survey (US Environmental Protection Agency, 1977).

  • Casey, J. A. et al. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential segregation, and spatial variation in noise exposure in the contiguous United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 077017 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E. & Nadybal, S. Social disparities in exposure to noise at public schools in the contiguous United States. Environ. Res. 175, 257–265 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins, T. W., Nadybal, S. & Grineski, S. E. Sonic injustice: disparate residential exposures to transport noise from road and aviation sources in the continental United States. J. Transp. Geogr. 82, 102604 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ray, M. Environmental justice: segregation, noise pollution and health disparities near the Hartsfield–Jackson Airport area in Atlanta. Rev. Black Polit. Econ. 50, 18–34 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kight, C. R. & Swaddle, J. P. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review: environmental noise and animals. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1052–1061 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Senzaki, M. et al. Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent. Nature 587, 605–609 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Read, J., Jones, G. & Radford, A. N. Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise. Behav. Ecol. 25, 4–7 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simpson, S. D. et al. Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation. Nat. Commun. 7, 10544 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunc, H. P. & Schmidt, R. The effects of anthropogenic noise on animals: a meta-analysis. Biol. Lett. 15, 20190649 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mitchell, B. & Franco, J. HOLC and ‘Redlining’ Maps: The Persistent Structure of Segregation and Economic Inequality (NCRC, 2018).

  • 2018 National Transportation Noise Map Dataset (US Department of Transportation, 2020).

  • Ising, H. & Braun, C. Acute and chronic endocrine effects of noise: review of the research conducted at the Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene. Noise Health 2, 7 (2000).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • What Noises Cause Hearing Loss? (National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022).

  • Nega, T. H., Chihara, L., Smith, K. & Jayaraman, M. Traffic noise and inequality in the Twin Cities, Minnesota. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 19, 601–619 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, Y.-K., Mitchell, U. A., Conroy, L. M. & Jones, R. M. Community daytime noise pollution and socioeconomic differences in Chicago, IL. PLoS ONE 16, e0254762 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White, K. & Borrell, L. N. Racial/ethnic residential segregation: framing the context of health risk and health disparities. Health Place 17, 438–448 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lam, K. & Chan, P.-K. Socio-economic status and inequalities in exposure to transportation noise in Hong Kong. Open Environ. Sci. 2, 107–113 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dale, L. M. et al. Socioeconomic status and environmental noise exposure in Montreal, Canada. BMC Public Health 15, 205 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brainard, J. S., Jones, A. P., Bateman, I. J. & Lovett, A. A. Exposure to environmental urban noise pollution in Birmingham, UK. Urban Stud. 41, 2581–2600 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lakes, T., Brückner, M. & Krämer, A. Development of an environmental justice index to determine socio-economic disparities of noise pollution and green space in residential areas in Berlin. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 57, 538–556 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buxton, R. T. et al. Noise pollution is pervasive in U.S. protected areas. Science 356, 531–533 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, 1992).

  • Davies, H. W., Vlaanderen, J. J., Henderson, S. B. & Brauer, M. Correlation between co-exposures to noise and air pollution from traffic sources. Occup. Environ. Med. 66, 347–350 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ross, Z. et al. Noise, air pollutants and traffic: continuous measurement and correlation at a high-traffic location in New York City. Environ. Res. 111, 1054–1063 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eglington, S. M., Noble, D. G. & Fuller, R. J. A meta-analysis of spatial relationships in species richness across taxa: birds as indicators of wider biodiversity in temperate regions. J. Nat. Conserv. 20, 301–309 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gasc, A., Francomano, D., Dunning, J. B. & Pijanowski, B. C. Future directions for soundscape ecology: the importance of ornithological contributions. Auk 134, 215–228 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White, M. E., Hamlin, I., Butler, C. W. & Richardson, M. The joy of birds: the effect of rating for joy or counting garden bird species on wellbeing, anxiety, and nature connection. Urban Ecosyst. 26, 755–765 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morley, E. L., Jones, G. & Radford, A. N. The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20132683 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jerem, P. & Mathews, F. Trends and knowledge gaps in field research investigating effects of anthropogenic noise. Conserv. Biol. 35, 115–129 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baker, K., Eichhorn, M. P. & Griffiths, M. Decolonizing field ecology. Biotropica 51, 288–292 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollock, L. J., Thuiller, W. & Jetz, W. Large conservation gains possible for global biodiversity facets. Nature 546, 141–144 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B. & Reilly, M. K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6, e23777 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, Y. & Cardoso, G. C. Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas? Behav. Ecol. 20, 1268–1273 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rheindt, F. E. The impact of roads on birds: does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? J. Ornithol. 144, 295–306 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Francis, C. D., Paritsis, J., Ortega, C. P. & Cruz, A. Landscape patterns of avian habitat use and nest success are affected by chronic gas well compressor noise. Landsc. Ecol. 26, 1269–1280 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Slabbekoorn, H. & Ripmeester, E. A. P. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol. Ecol. 17, 72–83 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowry, H., Lill, A. & Wong, B. B. M. How noisy does a noisy miner have to be? Amplitude adjustments of alarm calls in an avian urban ‘adapter’. PLoS ONE 7, e29960 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hage, S. R., Jiang, T., Berquist, S. W., Feng, J. & Metzner, W. Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4063–4068 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol. Lett. 3, 368–370 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song, S. et al. Bats adjust temporal parameters of echolocation pulses but not those of communication calls in response to traffic noise. Integr. Zool. 14, 576–588 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Francis, C. D. & Barber, J. R. A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 305–313 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dominoni, D. M. et al. Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 502–511 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duarte, M. H. L., Vecci, M. A., Hirsch, A. & Young, R. J. Noisy human neighbours affect where urban monkeys live. Biol. Lett. 7, 840–842 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lehrer, E. W. et al. Urban bat occupancy is highly influenced by noise and the location of water: considerations for nature-based urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 210, 104063 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kok, A. C. M. et al. How chronic anthropogenic noise can affect wildlife communities. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1130075 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Francis, C. D., Ortega, C. P. & Cruz, A. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Curr. Biol. 19, 1415–1419 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guenat, S. & Dallimer, M. A global meta‐analysis reveals contrasting impacts of air, light, and noise pollution on pollination. Ecol. Evol. 13, e9990 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Phillips, J. N., Termondt, S. E. & Francis, C. D. Long-term noise pollution affects seedling recruitment and community composition, with negative effects persisting after removal. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 288, 20202906 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grove, M. et al. The legacy effect: understanding how segregation and environmental injustice unfold over time in Baltimore. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108, 524–537 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390–394 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carrus, G. et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134, 221–228 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. & Warber, S. L. Does perceived restorativeness mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity and perceived naturalness on emotional well-being following group walks in nature? J. Environ. Psychol. 46, 217–232 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wolf, L. J., Zu Ermgassen, S., Balmford, A., White, M. & Weinstein, N. Is variety the spice of life? An experimental investigation into the effects of species richness on self-reported mental well-being. PLoS ONe 12, e0170225 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cox, D. T. C. et al. Doses of neighborhood nature: the benefits for mental health of living with nature. BioScience https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw173 (2017).

  • Franco, L. S., Shanahan, D. F. & Fuller, R. A. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 14, 864 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buxton, R. T., Pearson, A. L., Allou, C., Fristrup, K. & Wittemyer, G. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2013097118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Uebel, K., Marselle, M., Dean, A. J., Rhodes, J. R. & Bonn, A. Urban green space soundscapes and their perceived restorativeness. People Nat. 3, 756–769 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levenhagen, M. J. et al. Ecosystem services enhanced through soundscape management link people and wildlife. People Nat. 3, 176–189 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turo, K. J. & Gardiner, M. M. The balancing act of urban conservation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3773 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Investing in Equitable Urban Park Systems: Case Studies and Recommendations (City Parks Alliance, 2022).

  • 2021 Game Plan for a Healthy City (City of Denver Parks and Recreation, 2022).

  • Anguelovski, I. et al. Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nat. Commun. 13, 3816 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nelson, R., Winling, L., Marciano, R., Connolly, N. B. D. & Ayers, N. Mapping Inequality: Redlining in New Deal America (Mapbox, OpenStreetMap, 2019); https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/

  • Sears, C. G. et al. The association of traffic-related air and noise pollution with maternal blood pressure and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the HOME study cohort. Environ. Int. 121, 574–581 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • The R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).

  • McKenna, M., Shannon, G. & Fristrup, K. Characterizing anthropogenic noise to improve understanding and management of impacts to wildlife. Endanger. Species Res. 31, 279–291 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berglund, B., Hassmén, P. & Job, R. F. S. Sources and effects of low‐frequency noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2985–3002 (1996).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ellis-Soto, D., Chapman, M. & Locke, D. Uneven biodiversity sampling across redlined urban areas in the United States. Preprint at EcoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/ex6w2 (2022).

  • Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B. & Collins, A. Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews: making literature reviews more reliable. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1596–1605 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bombaci, S. et al. Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s4mw6m998 (2023).

  • Bombaci, S. et al. Inequalities in noise will affect urban wildlife. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7843664 (2023).

  • Rothstein, R. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How our Government Segregated America (Liveright, 2017).

  • Peet, R. Class struggle, the relocation of employment, and economic crisis. Sci. Soc. 48, 38–51 (1984).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, R. in Social Relations and Spatial Structures (eds Gregory, D. & Urry, J.) 164–189 (Macmillan, 1985).

  • Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites (United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, 1987).

  • Bullard, R. D. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (Routledge, 2018).

  • HOLC Maps (National Community Reinvestment Coalition, 2017); http://maps.ncrc.org/holc

  • Hendricks, M. D. & Van Zandt, S. Unequal protection revisited: planning for environmental justice, hazard vulnerability, and critical infrastructure in communities of color. Environ. Justice 14, 87–97 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nardone, A., Rudolph, K. E., Morello-Frosch, R. & Casey, J. A. Redlines and greenspace: the relationship between historical redlining and 2010 greenspace across the United States. Environ. Health Perspect. 129, 017006 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowak, D. J., Greenfield, E. J., Hoehn, R. E. & Lapoint, E. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ. Pollut. 178, 229–236 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nowak, D. J., Hirabayashi, S., Bodine, A. & Greenfield, E. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ. Pollut. 193, 119–129 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, R. & Chen, L. Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: mitigation and diversification. Ecosyst. Serv. 23, 38–46 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pulido, L. Rethinking environmental racism: white privilege and urban development in southern California. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90, 12–40 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pastor, M., Sadd, J. & Hipp, J. Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. J. Urban Aff. 23, 1–21 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M. & Sadd, J. Environmental justice and southern California’s ‘riskscape’: the distribution of air toxics exposures and health risks among diverse communities. Urban Aff. Rev. 36, 551–578 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, D. R. & Collins, C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep. 116, 404–416 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Subramanian, S. V., Acevedo-Garcia, D. & Osypuk, T. L. Racial residential segregation and geographic heterogeneity in black/white disparity in poor self-rated health in the US: a multilevel statistical analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 60, 1667–1679 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hayanga, A. J., Zeliadt, S. B. & Backhus, L. M. Residential segregation and lung cancer mortality in the United States. JAMA Surg. 148, 37 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kershaw, K. N. & Albrecht, S. S. Racial/ethnic residential segregation and cardiovascular disease risk. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 9, 10 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nardone, A., Chiang, J. & Corburn, J. Historic redlining and urban health today in US cities. Environ. Justice 13, 109–119 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nardone, A. et al. Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: an ecological study. Lancet Planet. Health 4, e24–e31 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Continue Reading
    Click to comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *